HyperBaseThe retained analysis reports land and utility development evidence that supports a scoped tenant evaluation. Firm capacity, sustainable water supply and a ready-for-service date remain open.
HyperBaseAgree a phased tenant brief and the evidence needed to evaluate it before considering a definitive commitment.
Set phased load, resilience, cooling, network and commissioning requirements.
Review current originals through the controlled virtual data room (VDR); reconcile source scopes and open conditions.
Define technical questions, responsible parties and decision criteria for the next phase.
Proposed evaluation scope; tenant suitability is not established. This edition summarizes retained analysis. Confirm the cited records against current originals before commercial reliance.
HyperBaseObtain current title exceptions and mineral/lien review; confirm rights serve the planned facilities. Reconcile the survey, Phase I and appraisal scopes in one parcel crosswalk.
HyperBaseThe record reports the LCRA LLI-2421 study agreement signed by 4 Nov 2025 and the PEC facility-extension agreement effective 10 Jul 2026. Construction and service remain conditional.
Requested study load: 2,100 MW at 345 kV. A separate 10% substation package describes a planned 1,050 MW net substation.
Issued studies, approvals, final upgrade scope, security, access rights and energization authority remain required. Electric-energy supply is a separate commercial workstream.
Executed development agreements and preliminary engineering do not establish a firm capacity award, an issued design or ready-for-service capacity.
HyperBaseThe portal’s Q2 2027 owner energization target requires reconciliation with these separate source milestones. Equal spacing shows sequence, not elapsed time; none establishes tenant service.
Energization; not service
PEC conditional ramp
PEC conditional ramp
PEC conditional ramp
Preliminary Phase 1 schedule
First 40 MW; preliminary
442 engines / 1,105 MW plan
Preliminary Phase 1 schedule
Next output: one governing schedule with dependencies and defined energization, substantial-completion and ready-for-service milestones.
HyperBaseA separate 191-engine / 477.5 MW source plan is retained for reconciliation; the two plans are not combined.
HyperBaseWater rights and permits remain open. Cooling technology, thermal capacity and water demand have not been established by this illustration.
HyperBaseThe Kerr Summary reports a 48-strand LCRA backbone approximately 0.11 mile from the northern site boundary.
Obtain written strand or wavelength allocation, endpoints, latency, service levels, price and delivery date.
Survey and secure on-parcel lateral rights; demonstrate two end-to-end physically diverse routes.
Reported proximity and capability support carrier discussions. Contracted service, constructed laterals and route diversity remain to be evidenced.
HyperBase| Workstream | Required next evidence | Decision supported |
|---|---|---|
| Grid and supply | Issued studies and approvals; upgrade scope, security, supply and energization authority. | Whether a firm service basis can be established for the tenant load case. |
| Gas and generation | Binding fuel terms, lateral rights/design, plant and equipment commitments, and air-permit pathway. | Whether the proposed generation plan can advance toward execution. |
| Water and site | Priority well tests, rights/permits, water balance, title/access reconciliation and targeted site investigations. | Whether the phased layout and cooling requirements can be supported. |
| Network and schedule | Allocated service; surveyed diverse routes; integrated schedule with defined milestones. | Whether delivery assumptions are suitable for a bounded commercial package. |
Proposed priorities: agree owners and validate dependencies. An approved critical path has not been established.
HyperBase| Source basis | Value | How to use it |
|---|---|---|
| Utility study request | 2,100 MW / 345 kV | Study basis; firm capacity remains open. |
| 10% substation package | 1,050 MW net | Preliminary scope; issued design not established. |
| Source-scene planning label | 2 GW / 2,000 MW | Separate concept label; it does not establish secured, installed or committed capacity. |
| Phase 1 generation schedule | 442 engines / 1,105 MW | Preliminary authored plan; equipment and dates are not guaranteed. |
| Separate generation source | 191 engines / 477.5 MW | Distinct source plan requiring reconciliation; not added to Phase 1. |
Distinct source scopes: values are not additive and do not establish available tenant capacity.
HyperBaseDocument the load, resilience, cooling, network and commissioning criteria.
Review current originals and preserve source-specific assumptions, scopes and status.
Assign the tests, utility interfaces and engineering outputs needed to resolve the open gates.
Bring the evidence, delivery conditions and remaining uncertainties into one commercial discussion.
This presentation summarizes the retained source analysis and its recorded document/page references. Original-document verification is outside this edition’s preparation basis. Confirm current originals before commercial reliance; source-record labels do not establish completion of obligations.
HyperBaseDefine the phased tenant brief, identify the documents needed for review and agree a scoped technical diligence plan.